Okay, so I just read this really long essay about how the US is acting like a rogue state in trade wars and stuff, and how other countries should break away from American tech dominance. It's pretty intense. Let me try to unpack all of this.
First off, the essay starts by talking about new tariffs imposed by the US on its neighbors and allies. That seems unfair because usually, you don't impose tariffs on your closest friends, right? But the author is upset because the US is treating Canada like an enemy for trade purposes, which isn't cool. It's like if your best friend suddenly started charging extra for every time you borrow something from them.
Then, the essay goes into how this isn't just a trade issue but also about tech dominance. The author points out that countries rely too much on American companies like Amazon and Microsoft for cloud services. This reliance is seen as a vulnerability because if the US decides to cut off these services or impose restrictions, other countries would be in trouble. It's like having all your eggs in one basket, and the US might not always play nice.
The author suggests that instead of just restricting American companies, countries should develop their own tech infrastructure. They mention open-source technologies as a way to avoid dependence on big US firms. This makes sense because open-source is more transparent and less controlled by any single entity, which could prevent monopolistic practices.
There's also a part about how the current digital systems are too centralized, with just a few companies controlling everything. The essay argues for decentralization, where countries have more control over their own digital infrastructure to better fit their cultural and social norms. This seems idealistic but maybe necessary to avoid being influenced or controlled by foreign corporations.
The essay also talks about how the US has a history of interfering in other countries' affairs, which makes it untrustworthy. They mention things like overthrowing governments and imposing long-term sanctions, like on Cuba. The author is saying that since the US can't be trusted, other nations need to find new allies and build their own tech ecosystems.
One part I'm not entirely sure about is how feasible this all is. Developing an alternative tech infrastructure sounds really ambitious. It would require significant investment, skilled talent, and international cooperation. Plus, there's the challenge of creating something that's both functional and better than what's already out there from US companies. I mean, why would countries switch if the existing systems are working for them?
The essay also brings up the idea of digital sovereignty, which is about having control over one's own data and technology. That makes sense in terms of national security and privacy. But implementing that on a global scale must be complicated, especially with how interconnected everything is.
Another point is about focusing on public good rather than profit maximization. The author wants tech to serve society better instead of just creating more unicorns (highly valued startups). This shift would require a different approach where governments play a bigger role in funding and directing projects. But I wonder if this could stifle innovation, which often comes from the private sector.
There's also mention of not wanting to switch to Chinese tech as an alternative, which is interesting. It seems like the goal isn't just to replace American dominance with another country's but to create something entirely different that's more equitable and serves everyone better.
The essay ends by emphasizing that this shift is necessary because the US has shown it can't be trusted, especially after treating allies poorly in trade wars. It calls for embracing the end of American hegemony and building a better world through new tech infrastructure.
Overall, I think the main idea is that countries need to reduce their reliance on US technology and work together to create their own systems that prioritize public good over corporate interests. This would make them less vulnerable to US actions and lead to a more balanced global order. But I'm not sure how realistic this is without significant changes in policies, investments, and international collaborations.
I also wonder about the timeline. Can countries realistically develop this alternative infrastructure quickly enough before they're forced into making concessions because of ongoing trade tensions? And what are the potential risks if some countries try to go it alone versus working together?
Another thing to consider is how much pushback there might be from US companies and possibly even the government itself. If other nations start developing their own tech ecosystems, would the US retaliate further in trade or other areas?
Lastly, the essay seems optimistic about the possibilities but maybe underestimates the challenges involved. Building a new global tech infrastructure isn't just about technology; it involves politics, economics, and cultural shifts across many countries.
#Technology #GlobalTrade #TechEcosystems #OpenSource #Decentralization #PublicGood #PolicyChanges #InternationalCollaboration #NationsTogether
Reply to https://mastodon.online/@parismarx/114106726212267955
(he/him) 
Knitting Our Internet Italy Tour! 
participation is completely free. If you won’t be around, please help me spread the word to friends and curious folks around the country! Everyone is invited. 
Special note: while I will be in Bologna, we are planning to gather in person and collectively attend 
To get the latest info, visit 
Бур 
Pinned Thread 